Quick Options

NSFW Content:
Listing Mode:
Coloring Style:
Animations:

◀ Quick Options    Login    Register
X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
xxovercastxx
Member Profile
Member Since: 2007-02-23
Last Power Points used: 2009-09-23 • Available: now
Max Power Points: 1 • Get More Power Points Now

Comments
No, that will never be a consideration because it would leave everyone vulnerable to attack.

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
I seem to be finding more and more javascript-based embeds from the small sites, particularly MMA videos that I'm trying to sift or resurrect. Any chance VS will allow them in the future?


written by lucky760  | 9 hours 39 minutes 46 seconds ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Check your settings, my Curve 8900 caches. Yes, you have to have downloaded the info at some point, but it chaches the map just to avoid excess downloading fees.

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
>> ^shole:
If I fire up gmaps in a deadzone on my blackberry, it tells me there's no service and does nothing. It ought to cache the road map if not the satellite imagery.



written by Payback  | 1 day 15 hours 18 minutes ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Because it's science!!

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
Then why'd you vote for it?

In reply to this comment by ant:
Video doesn't seem to play for me.



written by ant  | 2 days 7 hours 30 minutes ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
HAH!! Thanks man, that was rich! The vamp from a crappy dvd intro screen woke me up and I can't go back to sleep and find that Pole, a Czech, and a strange Russian woman in my head ......Ya frikkin' crazy bastard!!!


written by choggie  | 5 days 22 hours 16 minutes ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
choggie re-uploaded this video. I have replaced the embed.

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
*dead


written by dotdude  | 1 week 4 days ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.


written by siftbot  | 2 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.


written by siftbot  | 2 weeks 2 days ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Very nice of you to mention this. James Roe isn't completely inactive, as far as I know, and edeot is on active service in Iraq since beginning of summer, so I hope he'll be back in some months' time.

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
Maybe instead of resurrecting banned members we should be hunting down appreciated members who left and trying to get them to return.

karaidl
mlx
michie
firefly
pigeon (who just might have left due to being profile-stalked by ant, it seems)
raven
james roe
ladybug
intangiblemeg
smibbo
edeot
daphne...



written by EDD  | 2 weeks 4 days ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.


written by siftbot  | 2 weeks 4 days ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Just thought I'd encourage the temptation...

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
I'm highly tempted to vote this up. That's saying a lot, coming from me.


written by Sagemind  | 2 weeks 5 days ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
I guess I misunderstood you. I thought you were trying to make the point that consumerism was an effective form of democracy. I earnestly concede your point that businesses without business go out of business, though I wouldn't call it 'bringing down' which is a term that implies deliberate intent.

Corporations do care about small towns. Walmart is famous for setting up shop in small towns and putting local businesses out of business. In many places, Walmart is the only shopping option. When a business as large as Walmart comes to town, they can usually strongarm local governments into tax breaks and beneficial infrastructure projects. I only know of one case where Walmart was prevented from building a store, and that was in the small town of Los Angeles. I sure hope you are right about Walmart, but I only see people becoming more dependent on Walmart as they ravage the underclass.

Democratic government is people power by definition, even when the government you elect fails to stand up to powerful financial interests. I too am disillusioned about the current state of our state, but what gives me hope is that more and more people are becoming aware of these problems through increased access to information and technology.

Despite my screenname, I don't believe things are getting worse. I believe things have always been bad, and that it is only our increased access to information and communication that gives us the perception that things are getting worse. This new awareness (potentially) gives us the opportunity to diagnose problems and (hopefully) fix them. I believe the shift in the electorate from Bush towards Obama is evidence of this, and whether or not his administration has the power to make the changes they promised, he will at least make it easier for the next president.

This is why I see hope in darkness, and the will for change in our dystopian present.


written by dystopianfuturetoday  | 3 weeks 5 days ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)
Of course you can respond. I don't want a concession I haven't earned.

The failure of Circuit City (or any of the others on your list) has had no meaningful impact on reducing corporate abuse. Circuit City was replace by Best Buy, which treats its employees worse than its predecessor. So in this case, 'wallet democracy' has actually made things worse.

This is because "wallet democracy" isn't based on intelligence, wisdom, morality or any kind of desire for social justice, it's based on convenient location, ad campaigns, low prices and blue light specials. These out-of-whack priorities have no real chance at achieving anything positive, and usually end up doing the opposite, by empowering the worst offenders, like Wal*Mart. I've not shopped in a Wal*Mart in over a decade, but still they thrive, despite my furious wallet. I guess the people have spoken, and working class dignity is an inferior candidate to low low prices.

'State's Rights' is another favorite corporate think tank meme, for the simple and obvious reason that corporations would rather face small enemies than large ones. Corporations have vast resources that they can use to bribe desperate states, to pit states against each other, and to punish states that don't toe the line, among other things.

I don't see local politicians being any less susceptible to lobbying; or local voters being any less susceptible to expensive ad campaigns, in fact, small town folk might be more suceptible to the glitz and glamor of corporate favor than their seasoned national counterparts. A few of the larger metropolitan areas might be organized enough to make a stand, but I can't see it realistically living up to your expectations.

Beyond all that, do you ever use the local control you already have?

-Have you ever attended a city council meeting?
-Do you research your local candidates in any depth?
-Do you know the names of local politicians, state senators, state congressmen, local judges and/or city council members?

Anyway, I like the old Clinton quote that goes something like 'there is nothing wrong with America that can't be fixed by what is right with America'. For better or for worse, our country is 'our' country, and as long as it remains our country, we have the ability to change it. It's easy to feel down about our country, because we are getting our asses kicked by a very small, but wealthy and powerful segment of our population. If enough of us can figure this out, and are mad enough to do something about it, we win. It's a big if.

(hahaha, nice dick joke)


written by dystopianfuturetoday  | 1 month ago | CH
 -1  | flag spam (0)
Your video, The Making of Nine Inch Nails' Closer, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.


written by siftbot  | 1 month ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Can you give me a meaningful example of consumers bringing down a corporation by "wallet voting"? Of course not, because it is a ridiculous notion. Consumerism doesn't challenge corporate power, it increases it. At best, consumerism has the power to stop Coca-Cola from marketing a new cola that tastes like ass. Consumerism doesn't build schools or bridges. Consumerism is reactive, not proactive.

In a democracy, the power rests in the hands of the people, by way of 1 person: 1 vote. It was a populist response to older forms of government based around wealth, power and nobility. It is a testament to the success of democracy that so many now can take it for granted. Government power is people power (read=your power). Limiting the power of government limits the power of the people, and if you are interested in stopping corrupt corporations, public government is the only thing big enough and powerful enough to get that done.

It is very true that our democracy has been subverted in many ways, but through democracy, we can change this. I agree with you that apathy is one of the big enemies here, but I see much reason for hope. With increased access to information, the public has become much more aware of corporate abuse, and has become much more politically involved. Despite what Obama may or may not do in his 4-8 years in office, I think it is significant that he was able to break through the corporate propaganda and win on a very pro-people platform.

Last point, one of the great red herrings in this debate is that of 'size'. Notions about 'big' or 'small' government are completely arbitrary and meant to distract you from the more important qualities that you wisely mentioned: efficiency and effectiveness.

Government should not be shoehorned into some arbitrary concept of big or small. Government should be just the right size in needs to be, to be both efficient and effective. Getting rid of valuable social services in order to make the government smaller only makes the it less efficient and less effective.


written by dystopianfuturetoday  | 1 month ago | CH
 -1  | flag spam (0)
Don't forget to vote on your own video
http://www.videosift.com/video/The-Making-of-Nine-Inch-Nails-Closer


written by eric3579  | 1 month ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Democratic (not the party) government is people power. Without a strong government, there is nothing to stop corporations from taking over, which is why they are leading the charge to make government small.

Without democracy, individual consumers would powerless to make any kind of significant political changes, hence the push for 'individual liberty' at the expense of social liberty; and all that stuff about "markets self-regulating" is little more than a religious mantra, because there is no real world evidence that suggests such a thing is even remotely true.

The corporations have been very effective at drawing a wedge between the people and their government. They have actually fooled some of us into thinking things would get better if we were to give our power away. That's a mistake we only have to make once.



In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
I wonder what would happen if the government had less power? Seems to me that corporations get all their power by buying it from the government. If the government had no power to buy, would the corporations be effectively neutered?

I suppose the obvious counter-argument is that there would be nothing to keep them in check, but that's not true. The consumer would be (and always has been) the control. The problem, as always, is that the average Joe doesn't care. Very few people are willing to boycott an abusive company.

Whatever political ideology you subscribe to, I feel they will all be undone by apathetic citizens. Nothing will change unless the people change it.

In reply to this comment by dystopianfuturetoday:
Have you ever honestly questioned your belief in capitalism?
[...snip...]



written by dystopianfuturetoday  | 1 month ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
I have just ordered matching spats!

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
>> ^schmawy:
I happen to think that would look most excellent with a tophat tails and cane. It must be the penny farthing look it has.


Yike Bike Srs Cat avatar forthcoming?



written by schmawy  | 1 month ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Hehe, you're a seething cauldron of rage. I'll be sure to tag properly. Just find yourself some videos and get yourself to the gold level again.

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
>> ^Sarzy:
I actually went in and tried to edit them at first, but then I realized that it was a futile gesture.


I was compulsively editing them, usually a dozen or so a day, until I lost gold in the 4.0 switch. Now I just look and seethe.



written by gwiz665  | 1 month ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Sorry. I think I sounded short. I DO enjoy discussions, and I don't feel any animosity toward you for disagreeing with me. It's just that I've gotten into this argument more than once on this website and it's sort of draining afer a while. I find that I waste a lot of time that way because I love arguing so much.

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
I thought you enjoyed these debates. If not, just leave it at that. I'm not looking to stir up shit.

In reply to this comment by thepinky:
I don't have the time or desire to have this argument with you, but I have rebuttals for these points. Maybe if I take it bow by blow I can get through it eventually.

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
If he's perfect then progress is not possible by definition.


He's perfect in that he possesses every godlike attribute. It's not a matter of self-improvement. He is not increasing in love, mercy, knowledge, etc., but his creations and dominions are increasing, and his children are progressing. I don't see how that's a contradiction at all.

In reply to this comment by thepinky



written by thepinky  | 1 month 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
I don't have the time or desire to have this argument with you, but I have rebuttals for these points. Maybe if I take it bow by blow I can get through it eventually.

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
If he's perfect then progress is not possible by definition.


He's perfect in that he possesses every godlike attribute. It's not a matter of self-improvement. He is not increasing in love, mercy, knowledge, etc., but his creations and dominions are increasing, and his children are progressing. I don't see how that's a contradiction at all.

In reply to this comment by thepinky


written by thepinky  | 1 month 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Submit Comment
log in or register to submit new comment


1234...6>>
Member Stats
Rank: 246
Rating: 81 star points
Top 15 Videos: 2
Votes Received: 1630
Average Votes Per Video: 27.63
Votes Cast: 1713
Comments Posted: 2427 • browse
Comments Applauded: 26
Sifted Videos: 59
Unsifted Vids: 3
Sift Talk Posts: 19
Quality Sift Talk Posts: 8
Poll Posts: 1
Dead Pool Fixes: 16
Public Playlists: 6 • browse
Profile Views: 11440