Jim Rogers is not happy the Fed is bailing out Fannie and Freddy.
nazdorovia
My Post Bookmarks
tags:
tags:
tags:
This has got to be one of the strangest things I've ever seen.
tags:
"Two professional engineers illustrate the proper care and practical benefits of cats. None of the cats, humans, or engineers were mistreated in the making of this film. They were however, slightly annoyed."
tags:
Bored grocer demonstrates a never before seen martial arts move. Scene from Cashback.
tags:
Pretty much everywhere, it's gonna be hot.
tags:
Alisa Miller, head of Public Radio International, discusses how America perceives the rest of the world and how the news shape the way the US sees the world. She pulls up a map (image below) of the number... more inside
tags:
Slightly late for Christmas, but I guess - aw - it's on gift that's not being returned today. By the recipients, anyway. :p
tags:
The new Dragon Skin Body armor.. The army has banned it but from what I've seen, I want to get a set of this. It will take a grenade blast and laugh at it...
This is my first Sift Talk post, so I hope I'm not bring up issues that have already been discussed. These are just a few little things I've always wondered about on videosift:
1. If you are not the creator of the video, but you are the uploader,is it appropriate to submit it to videosift? I recently lost a rare Tom Waits live video to the dreaded dead, and I had the thought that it might be worth it to back up videos to our computers that, if dead, would likely be hard to find again.
This could also be useful if you see something cool on another video site not supported by VideoSift, or a non-flash video, and you wanted to share it on the sift. If this were allowed, you could download the video, re-upload it to your supported video site of choice, and post it to the Sift.
2. A suggestion: the embed code validation button is one of my favorite things about 3.0, but don't you hate it when you think your embed code is valid, but it's actually a dupe? I think it could be cool if every time this happened we could submit that code as a duplicate code, and then the Sift would recognize it as a dupe the next time someone went to submit it. For example, say I want to submit video A. The embed code is valid, but when I go to submit it the possible duplicates page show me that my video is a dupe. If there was a feature that stored alternate embed codes, this wouldn't happen to the next person who comes along and tries to submit video A.
Being able to see a list of alternates would also save us a lot of time *undeading videos, and if there was a "View Alternate Sources" button, we could see other places to find the video if say, youtube was running slowly (when I had dial up, videos used to load faster on Google Video for some reason. Don't know if this is true for anyone else).
3. Just a little one: is it redundant to tag words that're already in the video description the same way it's redundant to tag words already in your title?
Again, I'm sorry if this has been hashed through before. I just wanted to put it out there.
1. If you are not the creator of the video, but you are the uploader,is it appropriate to submit it to videosift? I recently lost a rare Tom Waits live video to the dreaded dead, and I had the thought that it might be worth it to back up videos to our computers that, if dead, would likely be hard to find again.
This could also be useful if you see something cool on another video site not supported by VideoSift, or a non-flash video, and you wanted to share it on the sift. If this were allowed, you could download the video, re-upload it to your supported video site of choice, and post it to the Sift.
2. A suggestion: the embed code validation button is one of my favorite things about 3.0, but don't you hate it when you think your embed code is valid, but it's actually a dupe? I think it could be cool if every time this happened we could submit that code as a duplicate code, and then the Sift would recognize it as a dupe the next time someone went to submit it. For example, say I want to submit video A. The embed code is valid, but when I go to submit it the possible duplicates page show me that my video is a dupe. If there was a feature that stored alternate embed codes, this wouldn't happen to the next person who comes along and tries to submit video A.
Being able to see a list of alternates would also save us a lot of time *undeading videos, and if there was a "View Alternate Sources" button, we could see other places to find the video if say, youtube was running slowly (when I had dial up, videos used to load faster on Google Video for some reason. Don't know if this is true for anyone else).
3. Just a little one: is it redundant to tag words that're already in the video description the same way it's redundant to tag words already in your title?
Again, I'm sorry if this has been hashed through before. I just wanted to put it out there.
tags:
The Nine Lives of Fritz the Cat is an R-rated animated film from 1974. The film features a series of drug-induced vignettes both related and unrelated to life in the 1970s, each ending with the title character... more inside
tags:
Does every state do this?
tags:
Never mind that the sound is a little out of synch. This shows the man with the brain as big as Kent not even trying to figure out the trick at the end.


Stumble This






Videos Submitted by nazdorovia