X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
|
| |
|
Trancecoach Member Profile  Member Since: 2007-12-04 Last Power Points used: 2009-07-04 • Available: now Max Power Points: 1 • Get More Power Points Now Comments |
Subscribe Navigation
Member Stats Rank: 132 Rating: 
158 star pointsTop 15 Videos: 7 Votes Received: 3689 Average Votes Per Video: 25.27 Votes Cast: 1235 Comments Posted: 3020 • browse Comments Applauded: 19 Sifted Videos: 146 Dead Pool Fixes: 12 Profile Views: 11866 Highest Ranked Comments Member's Highest Rated Videos |
Videos Submitted by Trancecoach
In reply to this comment by Trancecoach:
^What kinda dirty we talkin, schmawy?
In reply to this comment by Trancecoach:
As a Jew from NJ, I'd like to say that I've been living in CA since 2002.
In reply to this comment by Trancecoach:
You might also enjoy this video.
*science, *scifi
In reply to this comment by Trancecoach:
^Wrong.
Krippner (1977), Rao (1984), Targ & Puthoff (1977, pp. 182-186), and Tart (1982b) have all documented glaring errors made by James Randi who has failed on numerous occasions to award the money when he has been proved wrong. Instead, he makes up reasons after the fact about why an experiment failed to meet his criteria.
Dennis Stillings has demonstrated that "Randi is capable of gross distortion of facts" (Truzzi, 1987, p. 89). Randi has been quoted as saying, "I always have an out" with regard to his $1,000,000 challenge (Rawlins, 1981, p. 89). Puthoff and Targ (1977) documented a number of mistakes. In a published, handwritten, signed letter, Randi replied offering $1,000 if any claimed error could be demonstrated (see Fuller, 1979). Fuller proved Randi wrong. In a rejoinder to Puthoff & Targ (1977), Randi reversed himself (for a clear example, see point number 15 in Randi, 1982, p. 223). Randi should have paid the $1,000, but he never did."
Big surprise.
Hope it was worth the fuss.
In reply to this comment by Trancecoach:
Got it to work.
In reply to this comment by Trancecoach:
I'm in the US.
California.
In reply to this comment by rougy:
It's working for me, Trance.
I'm in the US. Mind if I ask where you're at?
In reply to this comment by Trancecoach:
"Invalid Parameters"
(blocked?)
I'm in the US. Mind if I ask where you're at?
In reply to this comment by Trancecoach:
"Invalid Parameters"
(blocked?)
...dude I can't stop listening to it
In reply to this comment by Trancecoach:
You've been warned...
Now it's time to smoke dust!!
That video isn't "dead" for me.
Do you know the command to make it undead?
In reply to this comment by Trancecoach:
*dead
In reply to this comment by Trancecoach:
Check out this sneak preview of the Manifesting the Mind film.
In reply to this comment by Trancecoach:
Not quite film noire, but noirish.. good nuff
Best wishes.
In reply to this comment by Trancecoach:
Check out this sneak preview of the Manifesting the Mind film.
In reply to this comment by Trancecoach:
Check out this sneak preview of the Manifesting the Mind film.
Just don't mistake your own fingers for white rice.
Either that or get a tan whitey
In reply to this comment by Trancecoach:
Oh, I'm making this. Try and stop me.